Page 28 - 《含能材料》2018年优秀论文

694 FENG Song，RAO Guo‑ning，PENG Jin‑hua

ulated by the AUTODYN software. Computed bub‑ of selected cast HMX‑based explosives［J］. Propellants，Explo⁃
ble pulse properties agreed well with measured bub‑ sives，Pyrotechnics，2012，37（2）：198-206.
［13］ Mader C L.Numerical modeling of explosives and propellants
ble pulse properties for all cases studied，with an av‑
［M］. New York：CRC press，1998：33-52.
erage error of peak pressure of shock wave bubble ［14］ Levine H B，Sharples R E. Operator's manual for RUBY［R］.
period approximately 1.79%，peak pressure 3.70%， UCRL‑6815：1962.
and maximum radius 2.30%. But the numerical re‑ ［15］ Cowperthwaite M，Zwisler W H. TIGER computer program
sults of bubble images didn't show the light in the documentation［R］. ADA002791：1973.
［16］ Nichols A L，Ree F H. CHEQ 2.0 user’s manual［R］.UCRL‑MA
bubble. It was different from the experimental imag‑ ‑106754：1990.
es. This simulation work is worth further research. ［17］ Baker E L，Capellos C，Stiel L I. Jaguar procedures for detona‑

tion properties of aluminized explosives［C］//12th Internation‑
References：
al Detonation Symposium，San Diego，California，2003：333.
［1］ Cole R H. Underwater explosions［M］. Princeton：Princeton
［18］ Fried L，Howard W M，Souers P C. Cheetah 2.0 user's manu‑
University Press，1948：228-233.
al，lawrence livermore national lab［R］. UCRL‑MA ‑117541 ：
［2］ Arons A B，Yennie D R. Energy partition in underwater explo‑
1998.
sion phenomena［J］. Reviews of Modern Physics，1948，20
［19］ Schoch S，Nikiforakis N. Numerical modelling of underwater
（3）：519-536. detonation of non‑ideal condensed‑phase explosives［J］. Phys⁃
［3］ Nielsen A T. Caged polynitramine compound：U. S. 5693794 ics of Fluids，2015，27（1）：281-288.
［P］. 1997. ［20］ Donahue L，Zhang F，Ripley R C. Numerical models for after‑
［4］ Geetha M，Nair U R，Sarwade D B，et al.Studies on CL‑20：
burning of TNT detonation products in air［J］. Shock Waves，
the most powerful high energy material［J］. Journal of Thermal 2013，23（6）：559-573.
Analysis and Calorimetry，2003，73（3）：913-922. ［21］ Wang X，Hossain K，Jackson T L. The three ‑dimensional nu‑
［5］ Caulder S M，Buess M L，Nock L A. An analytical study of the merical simulation of aluminized composite solid propellant
crystal quality of ε ‑ Hexanitro ‑ hexaazaisowurtzitane（CL ‑ 20） combustion［J］. Combustion Theory and Modelling，2008，12
synthesized using several different crystallization techniques （1）：45-71.
and intermediate precursors［J］. Science and Technology of En⁃ ［22］ Wang G，Liu G，Peng Q，et al. A SPH implementation with ig‑
ergetic Materials，2005，66（6）：406-410. nition and growth and afterburning models for aluminized ex‑
［6］ Thangadurai S，Kartha K P S，Sharma D R，et al. Review of plosives［J］. International Journal of Computational Methods，
some newly synthesized high energetic materials［J］. Science 2017，14（04）：1750046.
and Technology of Energetic Materials，2004， 65 （6） ： ［23］ Miller P J，Guirguis R H. Effects of late chemical reactions of
215-226. the energy partition in non ‑ ideal underwater explosions［C］//
［7］ Nielsen A T，Chafin A P，Christian S L，et al. Synthesis of poly‑ AIP Conference Proceedings，Colorado，1994：309.
azapolycyclic caged polynitramines［J］. Tetrahedron，1998， ［24］Miller P J. A reactive flow model with coupled reaction kinetics
54（39）：11793-11812. for detonation and combustion in non ‑ ideal explosives［J］.
［8］ Robidoux P Y，Sunahara G I，Savard K，et al. Acute and MRS Online Proceedings Library Archive，1995，418：413-420
chronic toxicity of the new explosive CL‑20 to the earthworm ［25］ Abe A，Katayama M，Murata K，et al. Numerical study of un‑
（Eisenia andrei）exposed to amended natural soils［J］. Environ⁃ derwater explosions and following bubble pulses［C］//AIP Con‑
mental Toxicology & Chemistry，2004，23（4）：1026-1034. ference Proceedings，Cambridge，2007：955.
［9］ Bolton O，Simke L R，Pagoria P F，et al. High power explo‑ ［26］ Bjarnholt G. Suggestions on standards for measurement and da‑
sive with good sensitivity：A 2：1 cocrystal of CL‑20：HMX［J］. ta evaluation in the underwater explosion test［J］.Propellants，
Crystal Growth & Design，2012，12（9）：4311-4314. Explosives，Pyrotechnics，1980，5（2-3）：67-74.
［10］ Simpson R L，Urtiew P A，Ornellas D L，et al. CL‑20 perfor‑ ［27］ Kowsarinia E，Alizadeh Y，Pour H S S. Experimental evalua‑
mance exceeds that of HMX and its sensitivity is moderate［J］. tion of blast wave parameters in underwater explosion of hexo‑
Propellants，Explosives，Pyrotechnics，1997，22（5）：249-255. gen charges［J］. International Journal of Engineering，2012，25
［11］ Lewis W K，Rumchik C G，Broughton P B，et al. Time ‑ re‑ （1）：65-72.
solved spectroscopic studies of aluminized explosives：chemi‑ ［28］ Katsabanis P D. Modelling of the underwater shock sensitivity
cal dynamics and apparent temperatures［J］. Journal of Applied of polyurethane FOAM/PETN explosives［J］. Journal of Energet⁃
Physics，2012，111（1）：014903. ic Materials，1992，10（4-5）：189-220.
［12］ Manner V W，Pemberton S J，Gunderson J A，et al. The role ［29］ Lee J，Kuk J H，Cho Y S，et al. Numerical modeling of under‑
of aluminum in the detonation and post‑detonation expansion water explosion properties for an aluminized explosive［J］. Pro⁃

Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials，Vol.26, No.8 , 2018（686-695） 含能材料 www.energetic-materials.org.cn