CHINESE JOURNAL OF ENERGETIC MATERIALS
+高级检索
DNAN及TNT基熔铸炸药综合性能比较
作者:
作者单位:

1.北京理工大学 爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室,北京 100081;2.安徽神剑科技股份有限公司;3.甘肃银光化学工业集团有限公司,甘肃 白银730900

作者简介:

朱道理(1989-),男,博士,主要从事熔铸炸药配方与性能测试研究。e-mail:zhudaoli_cxx@sina.com

通讯作者:

周霖(1962-),男,博士,研究员,主要从事熔铸炸药配方设计及产品研制工作。e-mail: zhoulin@bit.edu.cn

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目 11772060国家自然科学基金资助项目(11772060)


Comparison of Comprehensive Properties for DNAN and TNT-Based Melt-cast Explosives
Author:
Affiliation:

1.State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081,China;2.Anhui Shenjian Polytron Technologies Inc.,Hefei 230000, China;3.Gansu Yinguang Chemical Industry Group Co., Ltd, Baiyin 930900, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    为了对比载体炸药2,4,6-三硝基甲苯(TNT)和2,4-二硝基苯甲醚(DNAN)、以及以它们为基的熔铸炸药的综合性能,系统研究了DNAN和TNT、以及DNAN/HMX(20/80)和TNT/HMX(25/75)熔铸炸药的流变、能量、安全、以及力学等性能。结果表明:载体炸药DNAN(6.87 mPa·s)的粘度低于TNT(9.05 mPa·s),DNAN/HMX熔铸体系的极限固含量(约80%)高于TNT/HMX熔铸体系(约75%);DNAN/HMX(20/80)和TNT/HMX(25/75)熔铸炸药的爆速分别为8336 m·s-1和8452 m·s-1,爆压分别为31.03 GPa和31.44 GPa;在1 K·min-1的慢速烤燃条件下,DNAN/HMX(20/80)和TNT/HMX(25/75)熔铸炸药的响应等级分别为燃烧反应和爆炸反应;在4.51GPa的冲击波入射压力条件下,TNT/HMX(25/75)在8~12 mm内达到完全爆轰,而DNAN/HMX(20/80)在12 mm内未能达到完全爆轰;DNAN/HMX(20/80)的抗拉和抗压强度均大于TNT/HMX(25/75)。因此可以得出结论,在能量性能基本持平的情况下,DNAN/HMX(20/80)熔铸炸药的安全及力学性能优于TNT/HMX(25/75)熔铸炸药。

    Abstract:

    In order to compare the comprehensive properties of 2,4-dinitroanisole(DNAN)-based and 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene(TNT) -based melt-cast explosives, the suspension rheology, performance, safety and mechanical properties of typical TNT-based and DNAN-based explosives were systematically investigated by experiment tests. The viscosity of DNAN(6.87 mPa·s) was lower than that of TNT(9.05 mPa·s), which made the limit solid content of the DNAN/HMX melt-cast system (about 80%) higher than that of the TNT/HMX melt-cast system (about 75%). The detonation velocity and detonation pressure was 8336 m·s-1 and 31.03 GPa, 8452 m·s-1 and 31.44 GPa, for DNAN/HMX(20/80) and TNT/HMX(25/75), respectively. The response level of DNAN/HMX(20/80) and TNT/HMX(25/75) was burning and explosion, respectively under 1 K·min-1 slow cook-off. Under 4.51 GPa incident shock wave pressure, TNT/HMX(25/75)achieved complete detonation within 8-12 mm, whereas DNAN/HMX(20/80) failed to achieve complete detonation within 12 mm; tensile and compressive strength of DNAN/HMX(20/80) was higher than that of TNT/HMX(25/75).With basically equal energy performance, DNAN/HMX(20/80) melt-cast explosives have better safety and mechanical properties than TNT/HMX(25/75) melt-cast explosives.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
文章指标
  • PDF下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 摘要点击次数:
  • 引用次数:
引用本文

朱道理,周霖,张向荣,等. DNAN及TNT基熔铸炸药综合性能比较[J].含能材料, 2019, 27(11):923-930. DOI:10.11943/CJEM2019170.
ZHU Dao-li, ZHOU Lin, ZHANG Xiang-rong, et al. Comparison of Comprehensive Properties for DNAN and TNT-Based Melt-cast Explosives[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2019, 27(11):923-930. DOI:10.11943/CJEM2019170.

复制
历史
  • 收稿日期: 2019-06-16
  • 最后修改日期: 2019-07-31
  • 录用日期: 2019-09-06
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-11-27
  • 出版日期: 2019-11-25