CHINESE JOURNAL OF ENERGETIC MATERIALS
+高级检索
爆炸物的现场快速检测技术研究进展
作者:
作者单位:

1.江苏警官学院, 江苏 南京 210031;2.沭阳县公安局, 江苏 宿迁 223652

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

江苏省高等学校自然科学研究项目(24KJB430016);江苏警官学院自然科学研究项目(2022SJYZZ01)


This paper reviews the research and application progress of four types of on-site rapid detection methods for explosives (chromatography-mass spectrometry coupling, spectroscopic analysis, ion mobility spectrometry, and chemical sensing), analyzes and summarizes their suitable targets, advantages, and limitations, and provides an outlook on their development directions.
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Jiangsu Police Institute;2.Shuyang County Public Security Bureau

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 支撑附件
    摘要:

    对4类爆炸物现场快速检测技术(色谱-质谱联用技术、光谱分析技术、离子迁移谱技术、化学传感技术)的研究应用进展进行了综述,分析总结其适用对象、优点和局限性,并对其发展方向进行了展望。色谱-质谱联用技术中,气质联用技术(GC-MS)灵敏度高,适用于易挥发且热稳定炸药;液质联用技术(LC-MS)操作条件苛刻,但适用于大多数无机、有机炸药。光谱分析技术中,拉曼光谱(Raman)取样量小、操作简单,但对高感度炸药存在爆炸风险;太赫兹光谱(THz)安全性高、穿透性强,但易受环境影响,适用于具有特征吸收峰炸药。离子迁移谱技术(IMS)检测限低、响应快,但难兼顾分辨率与灵敏度,只适用于易挥发炸药。化学传感技术中,荧光探针法灵敏度高、选择性好、可视化,但抗干扰弱且操作复杂,化学比色法简便廉价、响应快,但易受干扰且大部分受限于可见光,两者皆仅适用于特定爆炸物。通过分析比较现有技术,提出未来研究方向应聚焦于多技术融合、设备小型化、抗干扰能力提升及多目标检测能力优化等方面,以提升检测方法的抗干扰、多目标现场快检与智能化水平,为完善爆炸物现场检测技术、确保安全保障工作的有效开展提供参考。

    Abstract:

    This paper reviews the research and application progress of four types of on-site rapid detection methods for explosives (chromatography-mass spectrometry coupling, spectroscopic analysis, ion mobility spectrometry, and chemical sensing), analyzes and summarizes their suitable targets, advantages, and limitations, and provides an outlook on their development directions. Among chromatography-mass spectrometry coupling technologies, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) offers high sensitivity and are suitable for volatile and thermally stable explosives. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) requires stringent operating conditions but are suitable for most inorganic and organic explosives. Among spectroscopic techniques, Raman spectroscopy requires only a small sample amount and are simple to operate, but it poses explosion risks for highly sensitive explosives. Terahertz spectroscopy (THz) is safer and has strong penetration, but it is easily influenced by environmental factors and is suitable for explosives with characteristic absorption peaks. Ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) provides low detection limit and rapid response, but they are difficult to balance resolution and sensitivity, making it more appropriate for volatile explosives. Among chemical sensing technologies, fluorescence probe methods show high sensitivity, good selectivity, and visualization capabilities, but they are susceptible to interference and relatively complex to operate. Chemical colorimetric methods are simple, inexpensive, and fast-responding but are easily interfered with and mostly limited to the visible light. Both methods are only suitable for specific explosives. By analyzing and comparing existing technologies, it is proposed that future research should focus on the integration of multiple technologies, device miniaturization, enhancement of anti-interference capability, and optimization of multi-target detection capabilities, in order to improve the anti-interference performance, on-site rapid detection of multiple targets, and intelligence level of detection methods, providing a reference for perfecting on-site explosive detection technology and ensuring the effective implementation of safety and security measures.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
文章指标
  • PDF下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 摘要点击次数:
  • 引用次数:
引用本文

唐乐,胡辰辰,马艺宁,等.爆炸物的现场快速检测技术研究进展[J].含能材料, 2025, 33(10):1228-1254. DOI:10.11943/CJEM2025188.
TANG Yue, HU Chen-chen, MA Yi-ning, et al. This paper reviews the research and application progress of four types of on-site rapid detection methods for explosives (chromatography-mass spectrometry coupling, spectroscopic analysis, ion mobility spectrometry, and chemical sensing), analyzes and summarizes their suitable targets, advantages, and limitations, and provides an outlook on their development directions.[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2025, 33(10):1228-1254. DOI:10.11943/CJEM2025188.

复制
历史
  • 收稿日期: 2025-09-02
  • 最后修改日期: 2025-10-21
  • 录用日期: 2025-10-14
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-10-21
  • 出版日期: